Mustafa Buğra Ayaz1, Ali Çağrı Tekin2, Süreyya Ergün Bozdağ3, Serhat Gürbüz1, Mehmet Kürşad Bayraktar2, Esra Akdaş Tekin4

1Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Metin Sabancı Baltalimanı Bone Diseases Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye
2Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşcıoğlu City Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye
3İstanbul Technical University, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Laboratory of Biomechanics and Strength of Materials, İstanbul, Türkiye
4Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşcıoğlu City Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye

Keywords: Biodegradable plate, biomechanics, composite material, finite element analysis, fracture fixation, implant design

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to investigate the influence of implant design factors on mechanical behavior and to identify lowerprofile biocomposite plate configurations with mechanical responses approaching those of a titanium reference construct under selected loading conditions.

Materials and methods: In this computational finite element study, three-dimensional implant models were developed, and material properties of polyamide-6/nano-hydroxyapatite and titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V) were assigned. Seven composite plate types were modeled: flat (thicknesses 8, 9, and 10 mm), bellied, curved, enhanced, and hybrid plate. All constructs were mounted on a cylindrical synthetic femoral diaphyseal surrogate and fixed with six screws. Finite element analysis was conducted using ANSYS Mechanical 2022 R2 under axial compression (800 N), distraction (300 N), and torsion (10 Nm). Mechanical responses including maximum deformation, von Mises stress, and strain distribution in bone, plate, and screws were evaluated. Results were evaluated descriptively and comparatively across implant configurations and loading conditions.

Results: The titanium construct generally demonstrated the lowest deformation under torsional loading and the lowest plate strain response, whereas selected composite geometries approached or exceeded titanium-like deformation performance under specific loading modes. The hybrid plate showed the lowest deformation under compression, while the thick flat plate provided the lowest deformation among composites under distraction and torsion. The bellied design showed lower torsion-induced deformation and lower plate stress than most other lower-profile composite configurations. The enhanced plate exhibited the lowest plate strain among the composite models under compression and distraction but may pose challenges for soft tissue coverage due to its complex geometry.

Conclusion: Optimizing plate geometry can substantially modify the mechanical behavior of biodegradable composite constructs. Hybrid and enhanced designs demonstrated load-mode specific mechanical responses that may inform future biodegradable plate optimization, particularly with further material refinement and experimental validation.

Citation: Ayaz MB, Tekin AÇ, Bozdağ SE, Gürbüz S, Bayraktar MK, Tekin EA. The influence of design factors on the mechanical properties of biodegradable composite plates: A finite element analysis. Jt Dis Relat Surg 2026;37(3):851-862. doi: 10.52312/ jdrs.2026.3004.

Author Contributions

M.B.A.: Was responsible for the conception and design of the study and performed the data analysis; A.C.T.: Critically evaluated the manuscript and contributed to its intellectual content; S.E.B.: Participated in the study design, data analysis, and interpretation of the results; S.G.: Contributed to data collection; M.K.B.: Assisted in drafting the initial manuscript; E.A.T.: Performed the final review and made editorial revisions to the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript for submission.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.

Financial Disclosure

The authors received no financial support for the research and/or authorship of this article.

Data Sharing Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

AI Disclosure
The authors declare that artificial intelligence (AI) tools were not used, or were used solely for language editing, and had no role in data analysis, interpretation, or the formulation of conclusions. All scientific content, data interpretation, and conclusions are the sole responsibility of the authors. The authors further confirm that AI tools were not used to generate, fabricate, or ‘hallucinate’ references, and that all references have been carefully verified for accuracy.